AI OrbitExplore • Compare • Stay Ahead
Independent performance intelligence

AI Benchmarks & Leaderboards

Compare AI models and tools using structured benchmark results, source verification and weighted performance scoring — without reducing every product to a single unexplained number.

144Active benchmarks
666Verified results
26Ranked models
0Ranked tools
Technical Performance composite

Top AI Models

Weighted score using only technical performance benchmarks. Incompatible benchmark classes are never mixed.

Benchmark Methodology
Rank Model Provider Coverage Verified Technical Performance composite
#7 Claude 3.7 Sonnet logo Claude 3.7 SonnetCurrent Anthropic 4 tests 4 71.8
#8 o3 logo o3Current OpenAI 12 tests 12 70.0
#9 GPT-5 mini logo GPT-5 miniCurrent OpenAI 12 tests 12 69.8
#10 Gemini 2.5 Pro logo Gemini 2.5 ProCurrent Google DeepMind 20 tests 20 69.6
#11 Claude Sonnet 4 logo Claude Sonnet 4Current Anthropic 6 tests 6 68.7
#12 Claude Opus 4 logo Claude Opus 4Current Anthropic 7 tests 7 67.6
#13 Claude Fable 5.1 logo Claude Fable 5.1Current Anthropic 8 tests 8 67.3
Benchmark explorer

Results by Benchmark

See the leaderboard for each individual benchmark instead of relying only on an aggregate score.

Latest test: Sep 7, 2026
Product Experience · Product Experience

G2 Verified User Rating — Product Experience

Higher is better

Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.0/5 to 80.0/100.

#1HyperWriteAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#2SudowriteAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#3PaperpalAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#4Atlassian RovoAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#5FathomAI Tool · Verified 100.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

GPQA Diamond

Higher is better

Publicly reported reasoning benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 96.0
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 94.6
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 94.6
#4Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 93.7
#5GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 92.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience Proxy

G2 Parent-Platform Rating — Product Experience Proxy

Higher is better

Low-weight product-experience proxy normalized from a public 5-star parent/platform rating.

#1Rows AIAI Tool · Verified 98.0
#2ClickUp BrainAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#3Bito GovernorAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#4Canva Magic StudioAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#5Lyro AI AgentAI Tool · Verified 92.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.01× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

MMMU

Higher is better

MMMU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 84.2
#2o3AI Model · Verified 82.9
#3Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 82.0
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 81.6
#5GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 81.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience

Trustpilot Verified User Rating — Product Experience

Higher is better

Public product-experience rating normalized from 1.7/5 to 34.0/100.

#1ScholarcyAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#2CaptionsAI Tool · Verified 88.0
#3SciSpaceAI Tool · Verified 86.0
#4NightCafeAI Tool · Verified 82.0
#5Jenni AIAI Tool · Verified 72.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.05× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience

Product Hunt Verified User Rating — Product Experience

Higher is better

Public product-experience rating normalized from 5.0/5 to 100.0/100.

#1ScenarioAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#2Splash ProAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#3KimiAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#4Browser UseAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#5AiderAI Tool · Verified 100.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.05× Discussion
Unclassified · Software Engineering

SWE-bench Verified

Higher is better

Structured performance benchmark tracked by AI Orbit.

#1Claude Sonnet 5AI Model · Verified 85.2
#2GPT-5AI Model · Verified 74.9
#3Claude Opus 4.1AI Model · Verified 74.5
#4Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 72.7
#5Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 72.5
Product Experience · Product Experience

Apple App Store Verified User Rating — Product Experience

Higher is better

Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.1/5 to 82.0/100.

#1GizmoAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#2StudyFetchAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#3Le ChatAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#4KnowtAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#5ManusAI Tool · Verified 94.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

AIME 2025

Higher is better

AIME 2025 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 94.6
#2o4-miniAI Model · Verified 92.7
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 91.1
#4o3AI Model · Verified 88.9
#5Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 88.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

Humanity's Last Exam (No Tools)

Higher is better

Humanity's Last Exam (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 24.8
#2Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 21.6
#3o3AI Model · Verified 20.2
#4GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 16.7
#5o4-miniAI Model · Verified 14.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.75× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

Aider Polyglot (Diff)

Higher is better

Aider Polyglot (Diff) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 88.0
#2o3AI Model · Verified 79.6
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 71.6
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 58.2
#5GPT-4.1AI Model · Verified 52.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

ERQA

Higher is better

ERQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 65.7
#2o3AI Model · Verified 64.0
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 62.9
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 56.5
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 50.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

MMMU-Pro (Average Standard + Vision)

Higher is better

MMMU-Pro (Average Standard + Vision) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 78.4
#2o3AI Model · Verified 76.4
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 74.1
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 73.4
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 62.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

VideoMMMU (Max 256 Frames)

Higher is better

VideoMMMU (Max 256 Frames) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 84.6
#2o3AI Model · Verified 83.3
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 82.5
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 79.4
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 66.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Vision

CharXiv Reasoning (Python Enabled)

Higher is better

CharXiv Reasoning (Python Enabled) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 81.1
#2o3AI Model · Verified 78.6
#3GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 75.5
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 72.0
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 62.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Higher is better

Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.7/5 to 94.0/100.

#1Claude CodeAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#2C3 AI PlatformAI Tool · Verified 90.0
#3Palantir AIPAI Tool · Verified 90.0
#4Protect AIAI Tool · Verified 86.0
#5Oracle AIAI Tool · Verified 86.0
Product ExperienceMax score 100Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-bench Verified (OpenAI 477 Tasks)

Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (OpenAI 477 Tasks) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 74.9
#2GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 71.0
#3o3AI Model · Verified 69.1
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 68.1
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 54.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

HMMT 2025

Higher is better

HMMT 2025 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 93.3
#2GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 87.8
#3o4-miniAI Model · Verified 85.0
#4o3AI Model · Verified 81.7
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 75.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.75× Discussion
Technical Performance · Mathematical Reasoning

FrontierMath Tier 4 v2

Higher is better

Publicly reported mathematical reasoning benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 97.6
#2Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 87.8
#3GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 83.0
#4GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 83.0
#5GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 68.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Professional Agents

AutomationBench

Higher is better

Publicly reported professional agents benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 41.4
#2Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 31.4
#3GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 18.1
#4GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 18.1
#5GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 15.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Software Engineering

DeepSWE v1.1

Higher is better

Publicly reported software engineering benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 74.1
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 72.7
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 72.7
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 69.6
#5Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 67.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.15× Discussion
Higher is better

Independent provider-voice speech arena; Elo reflects pairwise listener preference for generated speech quality.

#1CartesiaAI Tool · Verified 1,285.0
#2ElevenLabsAI Tool · Verified 1,215.0
#3Murf AIAI Tool · Verified 1,158.0
#4Hume AIAI Tool · Verified 1,056.0
#5DeepgramAI Tool · Verified 1,053.0
Technical Performance · Abstract Reasoning

ARC-AGI-3

Higher is better

Publicly reported abstract reasoning benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 99.9
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 7.8
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 7.8
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 0.8
#5GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 0.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Computer-Aided Design

BenchCAD

Higher is better

Publicly reported computer-aided design benchmark result.

#1Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 84.3
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 70.6
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 70.6
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 63.1
#5GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 62.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity

ExploitBench

Higher is better

Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 100.0
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 73.5
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 73.5
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 52.9
#5GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 33.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity

SEC-Bench Pro

Higher is better

Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 85.4
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 71.2
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 71.2
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 57.7
#5GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 48.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

FrontierMath (Python tool only)

Higher is better

FrontierMath (Python tool only) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5AI Model · Verified 26.3
#2GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 22.1
#3o3AI Model · Verified 15.8
#4o4-miniAI Model · Verified 15.4
#5GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 9.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.75× Discussion
Unclassified · Code Review

Martian Code Review Bench — Offline F1

Higher is better

Controlled code-review benchmark across 50 hard-to-find bugs; F1 balances precision and recall.

#1QodoAI Tool · Verified 48.4
#2CursorAI Tool · Verified 45.5
#3DevinAI Tool · Verified 44.2
#4GitHub CopilotAI Tool · Verified 43.5
#5CodeRabbitAI Tool · Verified 35.2
Unclassified · Code Review

Martian Code Review Bench — Online F1

Higher is better

Living open-source code-review benchmark based on real-world pull-request behavior; F1 balances precision and recall.

#1CursorAI Tool · Verified 61.7
#2CodeRabbitAI Tool · Verified 61.5
#3DevinAI Tool · Verified 60.8
#4GitHub CopilotAI Tool · Verified 60.7
#5QodoAI Tool · Verified 54.6
Unclassified · Image Generation

Artificial Analysis Text-to-Image Arena Elo

Higher is better

Blind pairwise human-preference Image Arena quality rating. Bradley-Terry maximum-likelihood ratings are rescaled to an Elo-like scale.

#1KreaAI Tool · Verified 1,221.0
#2IdeogramAI Tool · Verified 1,220.0
#3RecraftAI Tool · Verified 1,219.0
#4MidjourneyAI Tool · Verified 1,094.0
#5Leonardo.AiAI Tool · Verified 1,043.0
Unclassified · Research

DeepResearch Bench — RACE Overall

Higher is better

DeepResearch Bench RACE overall report-quality score across 100 PhD-level tasks in 22 fields.

#1GeminiAI Tool · Verified 48.9
#2ChatGPTAI Tool · Verified 47.0
#3PerplexityAI Tool · Verified 42.3
#4ClaudeAI Tool · Verified 40.7
#5GrokAI Tool · Verified 40.2
Technical Performance · Agents

Agents' Last Exam

Higher is better

Agents' Last Exam — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 52.7
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 52.7
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 50.4
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 50.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Agents

Toolathlon

Higher is better

Toolathlon — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 58.0
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 58.0
#3GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 53.4
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 53.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-Bench Pro

Higher is better

SWE-Bench Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 64.6
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 64.6
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 63.4
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 62.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

Terminal-Bench 2.1

Higher is better

Terminal-Bench 2.1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 88.8
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 88.8
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 87.4
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 84.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Computer Use

OSWorld 2.0

Higher is better

OSWorld 2.0 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 62.6
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 62.6
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 50.2
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 45.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity

Capture-the-Flag Challenges

Higher is better

Capture-the-Flag Challenges — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 96.7
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 96.7
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 91.8
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 85.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.35× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity

ExploitGym

Higher is better

ExploitGym — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 33.7
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 33.7
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 23.2
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 12.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.35× Discussion
Technical Performance · Health

HealthBench Professional

Higher is better

HealthBench Professional — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 60.5
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 60.5
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 57.7
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 55.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

GraphWalks BFS 1M F1

Higher is better

GraphWalks BFS 1M F1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 77.1
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 77.1
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 71.2
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 51.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

GraphWalks BFS 256K F1

Higher is better

GraphWalks BFS 256K F1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 90.7
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 90.7
#3GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 81.3
#4GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 76.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 256K-512K

Higher is better

OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 256K-512K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 91.5
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 91.5
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 89.6
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 41.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 512K-1M

Higher is better

OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 512K-1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 73.8
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 73.8
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 72.5
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 41.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

FrontierMath Tier 1-3 v2

Higher is better

FrontierMath Tier 1-3 v2 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 89.0
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 89.0
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 84.9
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 78.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

MMMU Pro (No Tools)

Higher is better

MMMU Pro (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 83.0
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 83.0
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 80.7
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 78.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

MMMU Pro (With Tools)

Higher is better

MMMU Pro (With Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 84.6
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 84.6
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 82.0
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 79.5
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Professional

Big Finance Bench

Higher is better

Big Finance Bench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 53.0
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 53.0
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 51.0
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 36.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation

Higher is better

Internal Research Debugging Evaluation — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 68.3
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 68.3
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 67.8
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 50.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research

KernelGen 1P

Higher is better

KernelGen 1P — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 61.1
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 61.1
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 49.2
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 22.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research

PostTrainBench Lite

Higher is better

PostTrainBench Lite — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 51.5
#2GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 50.3
#3GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 50.3
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 29.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Science

GeneBench Pro

Higher is better

GeneBench Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 28.7
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 28.7
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 23.3
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 10.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Science

LifeSciBench

Higher is better

LifeSciBench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 59.9
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 59.9
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 56.0
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 51.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Search

BrowseComp

Higher is better

BrowseComp — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 90.4
#2GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 90.4
#3GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 87.5
#4GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 83.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Higher is better

Independent full-stack app-builder composite measured with the same nine-prompt specification across five runs (45 recorded executions per product), scored 0–100.

#1LovableAI Tool · Verified 80.5
#2v0AI Tool · Verified 78.3
#3ReplitAI Tool · Verified 75.5
#4BoltAI Tool · Verified 74.7
Technical Performance · Coding

Aider Polyglot

Higher is better

Aider Polyglot — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 82.2
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 56.7
#3DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 53.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

LiveCodeBench

Higher is better

LiveCodeBench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 74.2
#2DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 65.9
#3Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 59.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Factuality

SimpleQA

Higher is better

SimpleQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 54.0
#2DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 30.1
#3Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 26.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multilingual

MMMLU

Higher is better

MMMLU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 87.4
#2Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 85.4
#3Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 70.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

MMLU

Higher is better

MMLU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 90.8
#2GPT-4oAI Model · Verified 85.7
#3GPT-4o miniAI Model · Verified 82.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Higher is better

KLAS Research 100-point overall performance score based on healthcare-provider feedback.

#1AmbienceAI Tool · Verified 93.5
#2AbridgeAI Tool · Verified 93.2
#3Nabla CopilotAI Tool · Verified 84.0
Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic Full 500 High Compute) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 80.2
#2Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 79.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic Full 500)

Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic Full 500) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 72.7
#2Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 72.5
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-bench Verified (Google Multiple Attempts)

Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Google Multiple Attempts) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 67.2
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 60.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-bench Verified (Google Single Attempt)

Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Google Single Attempt) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 59.6
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 48.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding & Terminal Agents

Terminal-Bench 4.0

Higher is better

Publicly reported coding & terminal agents benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 57.9
#2Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 55.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Factuality

FACTS Grounding

Higher is better

FACTS Grounding — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 87.8
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 85.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

LOFT Hard <=128K

Higher is better

LOFT Hard <=128K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 87.0
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 82.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

LOFT Hard 1M

Higher is better

LOFT Hard 1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 69.8
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 58.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

MRCR v2 8-Needle <=128K

Higher is better

MRCR v2 8-Needle <=128K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 58.0
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 54.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

MRCR v2 8-Needle 1M

Higher is better

MRCR v2 8-Needle 1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 21.0
#2Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 16.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multilingual

Global MMLU Lite

Higher is better

Global MMLU Lite — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 89.2
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 88.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

MMLU-Pro

Higher is better

MMLU-Pro is a robust multi-task language-understanding benchmark with a stronger emphasis on challenging reasoning questions.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 84.0
#2Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 67.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Scientific Agents

Terminal-Bench Science 0.1

Higher is better

Publicly reported scientific agents benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 64.6
#2Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 52.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

ActivityNet-QA

Higher is better

ActivityNet-QA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 66.7
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 65.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

EgoTempo

Higher is better

EgoTempo — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 44.3
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 36.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

Perception Test

Higher is better

Perception Test — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 78.4
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 75.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

QVHighlights

Higher is better

QVHighlights — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 75.0
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 52.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video

VideoMMMU

Higher is better

VideoMMMU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 83.6
#2Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 79.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Unclassified · AI Security

PINT Prompt Injection Detection

Higher is better

PINT evaluates prompt-injection detection systems on a 4,314-input multilingual dataset; reported score is higher-is-better, with benchmark configurations documented publicly.

#1Lakera GuardAI Tool · Verified 95.2
#2Amazon BedrockAI Tool · Verified 89.2
Higher is better

Blind pairwise human-preference Music Arena rating; users compare tracks from the same prompt and modality, with ratings calculated on an Elo-like scale.

#1SunoAI Tool · Verified 1,186.0
#2UdioAI Tool · Verified 954.0
Unclassified · Music Generation

Artificial Analysis Music Arena Elo — Vocals

Higher is better

Blind pairwise human-preference Music Arena rating; users compare tracks from the same prompt and modality, with ratings calculated on an Elo-like scale.

#1SunoAI Tool · Verified 1,171.0
#2UdioAI Tool · Verified 969.0
Unclassified · Software Engineering

SWE-bench Verified — Agent Systems

Higher is better

Human-validated 500-instance SWE-bench subset used to evaluate coding agents and systems.

#1OpenHandsAI Tool · Verified 65.8
#2Amazon Q DeveloperAI Tool · Verified 65.4
Unclassified · Software Engineering

Terminal-Bench 2.0 — Agent Accuracy

Higher is better

Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard accuracy for terminal-based agent tasks. Results are listed with agent, model, date and organization.

#1CodexAI Tool · Verified 82.2
#2FactoryAI Tool · Verified 77.3
Unclassified · Speech Recognition

Coval/Openbenchmarks Live STT — Average WER

Lower is better

Independent live speech-to-text benchmark on pinned, versioned datasets under production-realistic conditions. Word Error Rate (WER) is lower-is-better.

#1AssemblyAIAI Tool · Verified 3.2
#2SpeechmaticsAI Tool · Verified 4.3
Higher is better

Independent pairwise preference arena for image-to-video generation with audio; Elo is a relative quality rating.

#1Kling AIAI Tool · Verified 1,070.0
#2PixVerseAI Tool · Verified 1,067.0
Higher is better

Independent pairwise preference arena for text-to-video generation with audio; Elo is a relative quality rating.

#1Kling AIAI Tool · Verified 1,107.0
#2PixVerseAI Tool · Verified 1,072.0
Technical Performance · Abstract Reasoning

ARC-AGI-2

Higher is better

ARC-AGI-2 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Grok 4AI Model · Verified 15.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Agents

Tau2 Average

Higher is better

Tau2 Average — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 16.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese

C-Eval

Higher is better

C-Eval — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 91.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese

C-SimpleQA

Higher is better

C-SimpleQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 63.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese

CLUEWSC

Higher is better

CLUEWSC — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

Codeforces Percentile

Higher is better

Codeforces Percentile — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 96.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

LiveCodeBench v6

Higher is better

LiveCodeBench v6 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 29.1
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic 489 High Compute) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude 3.7 SonnetAI Model · Verified 70.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic 489 Internal Subset) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude 3.7 SonnetAI Model · Verified 63.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

SWE-bench Verified (DeepSeek Resolved)

Higher is better

SWE-bench Verified (DeepSeek Resolved) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 49.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding

Terminal-bench

Higher is better

Terminal-bench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 43.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity

CyberGym Pass@1

Higher is better

Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.

#1Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberAI Model · Verified 86.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity / Reliability

SRE-Bench

Higher is better

Publicly reported cybersecurity / reliability benchmark result.

#1GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 88.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Patching

CWE-Bench Pass@1

Higher is better

Publicly reported cybersecurity patching benchmark result.

#1Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberAI Model · Verified 47.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Finance Agents

Vals Finance Agent v2

Higher is better

Publicly reported finance agents benchmark result.

#1Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 61.4
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Instruction Following

IF-Eval (Prompt Strict)

Higher is better

IF-Eval (Prompt Strict) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 83.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Knowledge & Reasoning

HLE-Verified

Higher is better

Publicly reported knowledge & reasoning benchmark result.

#1Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 54.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Knowledge & Reasoning

Humanity's Last Exam (w/ tools)

Higher is better

Publicly reported knowledge & reasoning benchmark result.

#1Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 65.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Legal Agents

Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark

Higher is better

Publicly reported legal agents benchmark result.

#1Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 10.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context

MRCR v2 8-Needle 128K Average

Higher is better

MRCR v2 8-Needle 128K Average — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 13.5
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

AIME 2024

Higher is better

AIME 2024 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 79.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

AIME 2026 (No Tools)

Higher is better

AIME 2026 (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 20.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

CNMO 2024

Higher is better

CNMO 2024 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 78.8
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math

MATH-500

Higher is better

MATH-500 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 97.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal

MMMU Pro

Higher is better

MMMU Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 49.7
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Preference

AlpacaEval2.0

Higher is better

AlpacaEval2.0 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 87.6
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Preference

ArenaHard

Higher is better

ArenaHard — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

BigBench Extra Hard

Higher is better

BigBench Extra Hard — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 19.3
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

DROP (3-shot F1)

Higher is better

DROP (3-shot F1) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.2
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

FRAMES

Higher is better

FRAMES — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 82.5
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning

MMLU-Redux

Higher is better

MMLU-Redux — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.9
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Vision

MATH-Vision

Higher is better

MATH-Vision — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.

#1Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 46.0
Technical PerformanceMax score 100Weight 0.60× Discussion
Unclassified · Autonomous Driving

IIHS Real-World Safety — Crash Rate Reduction

Higher is better

IIHS real-world safety comparison of Waymo driverless operation with human drivers in matched locations/periods; score is percent lower police-reportable crash involvement per mile.

#1Waymo OneAI Tool · Verified 68.0
Unclassified · Healthcare AI

Clinical LVO Detection Study — Accuracy

Higher is better

Clinical evaluation of Viz.ai-LVO against board-certified neuroradiologist CTA interpretation in a large integrated stroke network; score used here is overall accuracy.

#1Viz.aiAI Tool · Verified 95.9
Higher is better

Independent Nature Medicine evaluation on 500 MedQA questions comparing specialized clinical AI tools and frontier models; score is answer accuracy.

#1OpenEvidenceAI Tool · Verified 89.6
Unclassified · Legal AI

VLAIR Legal AI — Document Q&A

Higher is better

Vals Legal AI Report (VLAIR) independent evaluation of legal AI applications on realistic legal work; score used here is Document Q&A accuracy.

#1HarveyAI Tool · Verified 94.8
Unclassified · Research

Elicit SLR — Extraction Accuracy

Higher is better

Percent correct for Methods, Participants and Interventions extraction tasks on the published evaluation.

#1ElicitAI Tool · Verified 95.6
Unclassified · Research

Elicit SLR — Search Recall

Higher is better

Recall of final-included studies retrieved using only the systematic-review title as the query.

#1ElicitAI Tool · Verified 95.0
Unclassified · Research

FRAMES — You.com ARI Accuracy

Higher is better

You.com public ARI evaluation on the independently developed FRAMES benchmark; score uses the original FRAMES evaluation method.

#1You.comAI Tool · Verified 80.7
Higher is better

Figure's public controlled evaluation of Helix S1 logistics manipulation after scaling demonstration data; score used here is barcode-orientation success rate.

#1FigureAI Tool · Verified 94.4
Higher is better

Observed unloading throughput reported in an official Boston Dynamics customer case study.

#1StretchAI Tool · Verified 1,200.0
Unclassified · Search & Retrieval

Exa WebCode Contents — Extraction Accuracy

Higher is better

Accuracy on Exa's open WebCode Contents track measuring extraction fidelity against golden markdown.

#1ExaAI Tool · Verified 89.3
How to read these rankings

Benchmark scores are evidence, not the whole product.

AI Orbit keeps individual results, benchmark coverage and verification visible so a single leaderboard number never hides the underlying data.

View benchmark methodology