Product Experience · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.0/5 to 80.0/100.
#1 HyperWriteAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#2 SudowriteAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#3 PaperpalAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#4 Atlassian RovoAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#5 FathomAI Tool · Verified 100.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
Publicly reported reasoning benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 96.0
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 94.6
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 94.6
#4 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 93.7
#5 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 92.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience Proxy Higher is better
Low-weight product-experience proxy normalized from a public 5-star parent/platform rating.
#1 Rows AIAI Tool · Verified 98.0
#2 ClickUp BrainAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#3 Bito GovernorAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#4 Canva Magic StudioAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#5 Lyro AI AgentAI Tool · Verified 92.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.01× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
MMMU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 84.2
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 82.9
#3 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 82.0
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 81.6
#5 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 81.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from 1.7/5 to 34.0/100.
#1 ScholarcyAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#2 CaptionsAI Tool · Verified 88.0
#3 SciSpaceAI Tool · Verified 86.0
#4 NightCafeAI Tool · Verified 82.0
#5 Jenni AIAI Tool · Verified 72.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.05× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from 5.0/5 to 100.0/100.
#1 ScenarioAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#2 Splash ProAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#3 KimiAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#4 Browser UseAI Tool · Verified 100.0
#5 AiderAI Tool · Verified 100.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.05× Discussion
Unclassified · Software Engineering Higher is better
Structured performance benchmark tracked by AI Orbit.
#1 Claude Sonnet 5AI Model · Verified 85.2
#2 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 74.9
#3 Claude Opus 4.1AI Model · Verified 74.5
#4 Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 72.7
#5 Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 72.5
Product Experience · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.1/5 to 82.0/100.
#1 GizmoAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#2 StudyFetchAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#3 Le ChatAI Tool · Verified 96.0
#4 KnowtAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#5 ManusAI Tool · Verified 94.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
AIME 2025 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 94.6
#2 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 92.7
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 91.1
#4 o3AI Model · Verified 88.9
#5 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 88.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
Humanity's Last Exam (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 24.8
#2 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 21.6
#3 o3AI Model · Verified 20.2
#4 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 16.7
#5 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 14.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.75× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
Aider Polyglot (Diff) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 88.0
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 79.6
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 71.6
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 58.2
#5 GPT-4.1AI Model · Verified 52.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
ERQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 65.7
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 64.0
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 62.9
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 56.5
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 50.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
MMMU-Pro (Average Standard + Vision) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 78.4
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 76.4
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 74.1
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 73.4
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 62.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
VideoMMMU (Max 256 Frames) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 84.6
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 83.3
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 82.5
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 79.4
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 66.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Vision Higher is better
CharXiv Reasoning (Python Enabled) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 81.1
#2 o3AI Model · Verified 78.6
#3 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 75.5
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 72.0
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 62.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Product Experience · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from 4.7/5 to 94.0/100.
#1 Claude CodeAI Tool · Verified 94.0
#2 C3 AI PlatformAI Tool · Verified 90.0
#3 Palantir AIPAI Tool · Verified 90.0
#4 Protect AIAI Tool · Verified 86.0
#5 Oracle AIAI Tool · Verified 86.0
Product Experience Max score 100 Weight 0.05× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (OpenAI 477 Tasks) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 74.9
#2 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 71.0
#3 o3AI Model · Verified 69.1
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 68.1
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 54.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
HMMT 2025 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 93.3
#2 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 87.8
#3 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 85.0
#4 o3AI Model · Verified 81.7
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 75.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.75× Discussion
Technical Performance · Mathematical Reasoning Higher is better
Publicly reported mathematical reasoning benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 97.6
#2 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 87.8
#3 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 83.0
#4 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 83.0
#5 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 68.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Professional Agents Higher is better
Publicly reported professional agents benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 41.4
#2 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 31.4
#3 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 18.1
#4 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 18.1
#5 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 15.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Software Engineering Higher is better
Publicly reported software engineering benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 74.1
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 72.7
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 72.7
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 69.6
#5 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 67.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.15× Discussion
Unclassified · Speech Quality Higher is better
Independent provider-voice speech arena; Elo reflects pairwise listener preference for generated speech quality.
#1 CartesiaAI Tool · Verified 1,285.0
#2 ElevenLabsAI Tool · Verified 1,215.0
#3 Murf AIAI Tool · Verified 1,158.0
#4 Hume AIAI Tool · Verified 1,056.0
#5 DeepgramAI Tool · Verified 1,053.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Abstract Reasoning Higher is better
Publicly reported abstract reasoning benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 99.9
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 7.8
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 7.8
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 0.8
#5 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 0.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Computer-Aided Design Higher is better
Publicly reported computer-aided design benchmark result.
#1 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 84.3
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 70.6
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 70.6
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 63.1
#5 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 62.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Higher is better
Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 100.0
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 73.5
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 73.5
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 52.9
#5 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 33.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Higher is better
Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 85.4
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 71.2
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 71.2
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 57.7
#5 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 48.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
FrontierMath (Python tool only) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5AI Model · Verified 26.3
#2 GPT-5 miniAI Model · Verified 22.1
#3 o3AI Model · Verified 15.8
#4 o4-miniAI Model · Verified 15.4
#5 GPT-5 nanoAI Model · Verified 9.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.75× Discussion
Unclassified · Code Review Higher is better
Controlled code-review benchmark across 50 hard-to-find bugs; F1 balances precision and recall.
#1 QodoAI Tool · Verified 48.4
#2 CursorAI Tool · Verified 45.5
#3 DevinAI Tool · Verified 44.2
#4 GitHub CopilotAI Tool · Verified 43.5
#5 CodeRabbitAI Tool · Verified 35.2
Unclassified · Code Review Higher is better
Living open-source code-review benchmark based on real-world pull-request behavior; F1 balances precision and recall.
#1 CursorAI Tool · Verified 61.7
#2 CodeRabbitAI Tool · Verified 61.5
#3 DevinAI Tool · Verified 60.8
#4 GitHub CopilotAI Tool · Verified 60.7
#5 QodoAI Tool · Verified 54.6
Unclassified · Image Generation Higher is better
Blind pairwise human-preference Image Arena quality rating. Bradley-Terry maximum-likelihood ratings are rescaled to an Elo-like scale.
#1 KreaAI Tool · Verified 1,221.0
#2 IdeogramAI Tool · Verified 1,220.0
#3 RecraftAI Tool · Verified 1,219.0
#4 MidjourneyAI Tool · Verified 1,094.0
#5 Leonardo.AiAI Tool · Verified 1,043.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
DeepResearch Bench RACE overall report-quality score across 100 PhD-level tasks in 22 fields.
#1 GeminiAI Tool · Verified 48.9
#2 ChatGPTAI Tool · Verified 47.0
#3 PerplexityAI Tool · Verified 42.3
#4 ClaudeAI Tool · Verified 40.7
#5 GrokAI Tool · Verified 40.2
Technical Performance · Agents Higher is better
Agents' Last Exam — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 52.7
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 52.7
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 50.4
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 50.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Agents Higher is better
Toolathlon — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 58.0
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 58.0
#3 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 53.4
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 53.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-Bench Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 64.6
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 64.6
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 63.4
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 62.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
Terminal-Bench 2.1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 88.8
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 88.8
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 87.4
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 84.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Computer Use Higher is better
OSWorld 2.0 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 62.6
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 62.6
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 50.2
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 45.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Higher is better
Capture-the-Flag Challenges — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 96.7
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 96.7
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 91.8
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 85.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.35× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Higher is better
ExploitGym — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 33.7
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 33.7
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 23.2
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 12.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.35× Discussion
Technical Performance · Health Higher is better
HealthBench Professional — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 60.5
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 60.5
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 57.7
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 55.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
GraphWalks BFS 1M F1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 77.1
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 77.1
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 71.2
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 51.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
GraphWalks BFS 256K F1 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 90.7
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 90.7
#3 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 81.3
#4 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 76.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 256K-512K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 91.5
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 91.5
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 89.6
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 41.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
OpenAI MRCR v2 8-Needle 512K-1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 73.8
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 73.8
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 72.5
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 41.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
FrontierMath Tier 1-3 v2 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 89.0
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 89.0
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 84.9
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 78.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
MMMU Pro (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 83.0
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 83.0
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 80.7
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 78.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
MMMU Pro (With Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 84.6
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 84.6
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 82.0
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 79.5
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Professional Higher is better
Big Finance Bench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 53.0
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 53.0
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 51.0
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 36.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research Higher is better
Internal Research Debugging Evaluation — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 68.3
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 68.3
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 67.8
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 50.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research Higher is better
KernelGen 1P — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 61.1
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 61.1
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 49.2
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 22.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Research Higher is better
PostTrainBench Lite — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 51.5
#2 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 50.3
#3 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 50.3
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 29.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Science Higher is better
GeneBench Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 28.7
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 28.7
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 23.3
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 10.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Science Higher is better
LifeSciBench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 59.9
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 59.9
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 56.0
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 51.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Search Higher is better
BrowseComp — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 GPT-5.6 SolAI Model · Verified 90.4
#2 GPT-5.6AI Model · Verified 90.4
#3 GPT-5.6 TerraAI Model · Verified 87.5
#4 GPT-5.6 LunaAI Model · Verified 83.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Unclassified · App Builder Higher is better
Independent full-stack app-builder composite measured with the same nine-prompt specification across five runs (45 recorded executions per product), scored 0–100.
#1 LovableAI Tool · Verified 80.5
#2 v0AI Tool · Verified 78.3
#3 ReplitAI Tool · Verified 75.5
#4 BoltAI Tool · Verified 74.7
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
Aider Polyglot — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 82.2
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 56.7
#3 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 53.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
LiveCodeBench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 74.2
#2 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 65.9
#3 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 59.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Factuality Higher is better
SimpleQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 54.0
#2 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 30.1
#3 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 26.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multilingual Higher is better
MMMLU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 87.4
#2 Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 85.4
#3 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 70.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
MMLU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 90.8
#2 GPT-4oAI Model · Verified 85.7
#3 GPT-4o miniAI Model · Verified 82.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Unclassified · Healthcare AI Higher is better
KLAS Research 100-point overall performance score based on healthcare-provider feedback.
#1 AmbienceAI Tool · Verified 93.5
#2 AbridgeAI Tool · Verified 93.2
#3 Nabla CopilotAI Tool · Verified 84.0
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic Full 500 High Compute) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 80.2
#2 Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 79.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic Full 500) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude Sonnet 4AI Model · Verified 72.7
#2 Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 72.5
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Google Multiple Attempts) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 67.2
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 60.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Google Single Attempt) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 59.6
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 48.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding & Terminal Agents Higher is better
Publicly reported coding & terminal agents benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 57.9
#2 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 55.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Factuality Higher is better
FACTS Grounding — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 87.8
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 85.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
LOFT Hard <=128K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 87.0
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 82.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
LOFT Hard 1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 69.8
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 58.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
MRCR v2 8-Needle <=128K — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 58.0
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 54.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
MRCR v2 8-Needle 1M — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 21.0
#2 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 16.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multilingual Higher is better
Global MMLU Lite — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 89.2
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 88.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
MMLU-Pro is a robust multi-task language-understanding benchmark with a stronger emphasis on challenging reasoning questions.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 84.0
#2 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 67.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Scientific Agents Higher is better
Publicly reported scientific agents benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 64.6
#2 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 52.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
ActivityNet-QA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 66.7
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 65.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
EgoTempo — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 44.3
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 36.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
Perception Test — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 78.4
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 75.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
QVHighlights — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 75.0
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 52.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Video Higher is better
VideoMMMU — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemini 2.5 ProAI Model · Verified 83.6
#2 Gemini 2.5 FlashAI Model · Verified 79.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Unclassified · AI Security Higher is better
PINT evaluates prompt-injection detection systems on a 4,314-input multilingual dataset; reported score is higher-is-better, with benchmark configurations documented publicly.
#1 Lakera GuardAI Tool · Verified 95.2
#2 Amazon BedrockAI Tool · Verified 89.2
Unclassified · Music Generation Higher is better
Blind pairwise human-preference Music Arena rating; users compare tracks from the same prompt and modality, with ratings calculated on an Elo-like scale.
#1 SunoAI Tool · Verified 1,186.0
#2 UdioAI Tool · Verified 954.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Unclassified · Music Generation Higher is better
Blind pairwise human-preference Music Arena rating; users compare tracks from the same prompt and modality, with ratings calculated on an Elo-like scale.
#1 SunoAI Tool · Verified 1,171.0
#2 UdioAI Tool · Verified 969.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Unclassified · Software Engineering Higher is better
Human-validated 500-instance SWE-bench subset used to evaluate coding agents and systems.
#1 OpenHandsAI Tool · Verified 65.8
#2 Amazon Q DeveloperAI Tool · Verified 65.4
Unclassified · Software Engineering Higher is better
Terminal-Bench 2.0 leaderboard accuracy for terminal-based agent tasks. Results are listed with agent, model, date and organization.
#1 CodexAI Tool · Verified 82.2
#2 FactoryAI Tool · Verified 77.3
Unclassified · Speech Recognition Lower is better
Independent live speech-to-text benchmark on pinned, versioned datasets under production-realistic conditions. Word Error Rate (WER) is lower-is-better.
#1 AssemblyAIAI Tool · Verified 3.2
#2 SpeechmaticsAI Tool · Verified 4.3
Unclassified · Video Editing Higher is better
Independent pairwise preference arena for AI video editing with audio; Elo is a relative quality rating.
#1 RunwayAI Tool · Verified 1,013.0
#2 Kling AIAI Tool · Verified 1,000.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Unclassified · Video Generation Higher is better
Independent pairwise preference arena for image-to-video generation with audio; Elo is a relative quality rating.
#1 Kling AIAI Tool · Verified 1,070.0
#2 PixVerseAI Tool · Verified 1,067.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Unclassified · Video Generation Higher is better
Independent pairwise preference arena for text-to-video generation with audio; Elo is a relative quality rating.
#1 Kling AIAI Tool · Verified 1,107.0
#2 PixVerseAI Tool · Verified 1,072.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Abstract Reasoning Higher is better
ARC-AGI-2 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Grok 4AI Model · Verified 15.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Agents Higher is better
Tau2 Average — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 16.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese Higher is better
C-Eval — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 91.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese Higher is better
C-SimpleQA — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 63.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Chinese Higher is better
CLUEWSC — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
Codeforces Percentile — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 96.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
LiveCodeBench v6 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 29.1
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic 489 High Compute) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude 3.7 SonnetAI Model · Verified 70.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (Anthropic 489 Internal Subset) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude 3.7 SonnetAI Model · Verified 63.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
SWE-bench Verified (DeepSeek Resolved) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 49.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.25× Discussion
Technical Performance · Coding Higher is better
Terminal-bench — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Claude Opus 4AI Model · Verified 43.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Higher is better
Publicly reported cybersecurity benchmark result.
#1 Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberAI Model · Verified 86.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity / Reliability Higher is better
Publicly reported cybersecurity / reliability benchmark result.
#1 GPT-6 AstraAI Model · Verified 88.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.10× Discussion
Technical Performance · Cybersecurity Patching Higher is better
Publicly reported cybersecurity patching benchmark result.
#1 Gemini 3.8 Flash CyberAI Model · Verified 47.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.15× Discussion
Technical Performance · Finance Agents Higher is better
Publicly reported finance agents benchmark result.
#1 Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 61.4
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Instruction Following Higher is better
IF-Eval (Prompt Strict) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 83.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Knowledge & Reasoning Higher is better
Publicly reported knowledge & reasoning benchmark result.
#1 Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 54.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Knowledge & Reasoning Higher is better
Publicly reported knowledge & reasoning benchmark result.
#1 Claude Fable 5.1AI Model · Verified 65.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.20× Discussion
Technical Performance · Legal Agents Higher is better
Publicly reported legal agents benchmark result.
#1 Gemini 3.8 FlashAI Model · Verified 10.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Technical Performance · Long Context Higher is better
MRCR v2 8-Needle 128K Average — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 13.5
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
AIME 2024 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 79.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
AIME 2026 (No Tools) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 20.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
CNMO 2024 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 78.8
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Math Higher is better
MATH-500 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 97.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Multimodal Higher is better
MMMU Pro — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 49.7
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.80× Discussion
Technical Performance · Preference Higher is better
AlpacaEval2.0 — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 87.6
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Preference Higher is better
ArenaHard — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.40× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
BigBench Extra Hard — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 19.3
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
DROP (3-shot F1) — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.2
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
FRAMES — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 82.5
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.50× Discussion
Technical Performance · Reasoning Higher is better
MMLU-Redux — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 DeepSeek-R1AI Model · Verified 92.9
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.70× Discussion
Technical Performance · Vision Higher is better
MATH-Vision — official/provider-reported evaluation result. Methodology conditions are preserved in the result notes.
#1 Gemma 3 27BAI Model · Verified 46.0
Technical Performance Max score 100 Weight 0.60× Discussion
Unclassified · Autonomous Driving Higher is better
IIHS real-world safety comparison of Waymo driverless operation with human drivers in matched locations/periods; score is percent lower police-reportable crash involvement per mile.
#1 Waymo OneAI Tool · Verified 68.0
Unclassified · Autonomous Driving Safety Higher is better
Tesla's rolling Vehicle Safety Report comparison for major collisions with FSD (Supervised).
#1 Full Self-DrivingAI Tool · Verified 7.0
Unclassified · Healthcare AI Higher is better
Clinical evaluation of Viz.ai-LVO against board-certified neuroradiologist CTA interpretation in a large integrated stroke network; score used here is overall accuracy.
#1 Viz.aiAI Tool · Verified 95.9
Unclassified · Healthcare AI Higher is better
Independent Nature Medicine evaluation on 500 MedQA questions comparing specialized clinical AI tools and frontier models; score is answer accuracy.
#1 OpenEvidenceAI Tool · Verified 89.6
Unclassified · Image Generation Higher is better
Independent pairwise preference arena restricted to open-weight text-to-image models; Elo is a relative quality rating.
#1 FLUX PlaygroundAI Tool · Verified 1,200.0
Unclassified Max score 1,500 Weight 1.00× Discussion
Vals Legal AI Report (VLAIR) independent evaluation of legal AI applications on realistic legal work; score used here is Document Q&A accuracy.
#1 HarveyAI Tool · Verified 94.8
Unclassified · Marketing Workflow Higher is better
Real-world production-time reduction calculated from an official customer example: two weeks to five days.
#1 TypefaceAI Tool · Verified 50.0
Unclassified · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from a 5-star scale to 0–100 for AI Orbit display/import.
#1 Freepik AI SuiteAI Tool · Verified 96.0
Unclassified · Product Experience Higher is better
Public product-experience rating normalized from a 5-star scale to 0–100 for AI Orbit display/import.
#1 GammaAI Tool · Verified 76.0
Unclassified · Product Experience Higher is better
Product-experience rating reported on the official Copy.ai reviews page and attributed there to G2.
#1 Copy.aiAI Tool · Verified 98.0
Unclassified · Product Experience Proxy Higher is better
Low-weight product-experience proxy normalized from a 5-star parent/platform rating.
#1 SoundHound AIAI Tool · Verified 86.0
Sensitivity/recall for abstract screening on the published Cochrane-derived evaluation set.
#1 ElicitAI Tool · Verified 96.9
Percent correct for Methods, Participants and Interventions extraction tasks on the published evaluation.
#1 ElicitAI Tool · Verified 95.6
Paper-level recall at the full-text screening stage on the published Cochrane-derived evaluation.
#1 ElicitAI Tool · Verified 99.5
Recall of final-included studies retrieved using only the systematic-review title as the query.
#1 ElicitAI Tool · Verified 95.0
You.com public ARI evaluation on the independently developed FRAMES benchmark; score uses the original FRAMES evaluation method.
#1 You.comAI Tool · Verified 80.7
Figure's public controlled evaluation of Helix S1 logistics manipulation after scaling demonstration data; score used here is barcode-orientation success rate.
#1 FigureAI Tool · Verified 94.4
Official NEO tendon-drive backdrivability specification.
#1 NEOAI Tool · Verified 95.0
Official Boston Dynamics Spot maximum locomotion speed specification.
#1 SpotAI Tool · Verified 1.6
Observed unloading throughput reported in an official Boston Dynamics customer case study.
#1 StretchAI Tool · Verified 1,200.0
Unclassified Max score 1,200 Weight 0.01× Discussion
Unclassified · Search & Retrieval Higher is better
Accuracy on Exa's open WebCode Contents track measuring extraction fidelity against golden markdown.
#1 ExaAI Tool · Verified 89.3
Unclassified · User Satisfaction Higher is better
YouGov net Satisfaction score among U.S. current and former users of the AI brand.
#1 Apple IntelligenceAI Tool · Verified 57.7