GPT-5
4 wins5 exact shared benchmarks compared
Compare GPT-5 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro pricing, benchmarks, context and capabilities side by side.

GPT-5 is a model from OpenAI, released on August 7, 2025. Its verified profile includes Text Generation, Reasoning, Image Understanding, Code Generation, Structured Outpu...
View profile
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a model from Google DeepMind, released on March 25, 2025. Its verified profile includes Text Generation, Reasoning, Image Understanding, Video Understan...
View profileFactual coverage of this comparison. AI Orbit does not declare a universal winner because the better choice depends on workload and evidence.
Public AI model profiles
Exact verified benchmark overlap
Profiles with structured API pricing
Latest verified pricing or benchmark evidence
Category-level facts from verified pricing, shared benchmarks and structured product data. These signals are not an overall ranking.
5 exact shared benchmarks compared
Lowest verified input-token price · tie
Lowest verified output-token price · tie
Largest comparable context window
Most recent listed release date
Only useful comparison fields are shown. Missing data is never guessed or treated as zero.
| Metric | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Google DeepMind |
| Context window | 400,000 | 1,048,576 |
| Input / 1M tokens | $1.25 | $1.25 |
| Output / 1M tokens | $10.00 | $10.00 |
| Status | Active | Active |
| Release date | Aug 2025 | Mar 2025 |
Estimate monthly token cost from the verified per-million prices stored on each model profile.
Estimate excludes discounts, caching, batch pricing, regional pricing and provider-specific fees unless already reflected in the stored rate.

Pricing verification pending

Pricing verification pending
Only exact benchmarks with verified results for at least two selected items count toward win totals.


| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified Verified Methodology | 74.90% Lead Verified · Aug 2025 Source | 63.80% Verified · Mar 2025 Source |
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MMMU Methodology | 84.20% Lead Verified · Aug 2025 Source | 82.00% Verified Source |
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond Methodology | 85.70% Verified · Aug 2025 Source | 86.40% Lead Verified Source |
| Humanity's Last Exam (No Tools) Methodology | 24.80% Lead Verified Source | 21.60% Verified Source |
| Benchmark | GPT-5 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| AIME 2025 Methodology | 94.60% Lead Verified Source | 88.00% Verified Source |
These verified results provide context but do not count as head-to-head wins because the other selected items do not have the same benchmark result.
Shared capabilities are separated from capabilities currently cataloged on only one selected item.


Structured use-case relationships only. Missing relationships are not interpreted as lack of capability.

No unique structured use-case match is verified for this comparison yet.

No unique structured use-case match is verified for this comparison yet.
See how much verified benchmark/pricing evidence supports each profile and when it was last refreshed.


Evidence dates show the latest dated record available to AI Orbit; they do not imply that every field was re-verified on that date.
Quick answers about this comparison.
Compare the side-by-side pricing, benchmark, capability and product data on this page. The better fit depends on your use case and the verified evidence available for each product.
Dynamic benchmark and pricing sections use the latest verified data stored in AI Orbit.
API cost depends on your input/output token mix. Use the cost calculator on this page to estimate the same workload with both models.
AI Orbit currently shows 5 shared verified benchmarks where both products have comparable results. One-sided benchmark evidence is shown separately and is not counted as a head-to-head win.
Build a production-focused model evaluation using real tasks, acceptance thresholds, adversarial cases, latenc...
Read analysis Benchmarks & EvaluationsAug 13, 2026Read AI leaderboards critically by checking benchmark scope, score normalization, source methodology, model va...
Read analysis Benchmarks & EvaluationsAug 12, 2026Create a fair model comparison using identical prompts, blinded scoring, known-answer tasks, latency measureme...
Read analysis